Design and Validation of an Instrument for Identifying School Autonomy as a Dimension of Teacher Motivation in Secondary Education: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70554/OBJK2026.v02n01.01Keywords:
Personal autonomy, Motivation, Teachers, Secondary SchoolsAbstract
Teacher motivation influences educational quality and teachers’ well-being. Among the institutional factors associated with it, school autonomy occupies a relevant place. This study focused on identifying school autonomy for the teaching motivation of secondary school teachers. It was a quantitative, descriptive, non-experimental, and cross-sectional study in secondary education institutions. A self-administered questionnaire with Likert-type items was administered, with content validity determined by expert judgment and construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis for ordinal data; reliability was estimated with omega and alpha coefficients. The analysis included descriptive statistics and classification using predefined scales for the school autonomy dimension. The aggregate pattern showed "operational" autonomy, with concentrations in intermediate categories and low variability. Autonomy was sufficient for planning, adjusting methodologies, and taking responsibility for daily work, but more limited in larger-scale curricular and organizational decisions. The homogeneity suggested shared institutional arrangements that standardize its scope. The identified school autonomy was at medium and stable levels, compatible with sustained functioning but with room for improvement to promote self-determined motivation.
References
Bakker, AB, & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Boateng, GO, Neilands, TB, Frongillo, EA, Melgar-Quiñonez, HR, & Young, SL (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Collie, NL, Shapka, JD, & Perry, NE (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029356
Deci, EL, & Ryan, RM (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals' leadership and teachers' motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275.https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055
Flora, DB, & Curran, PJ (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491.https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
Hayes, AF, & Coutts, JJ (2020). Use omega rather than alpha for estimating reliability. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 361–388.https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000349
Hinkin, TR (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Lynn, M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 71(2), 231–251.https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12123
Polit, DF, & Beck, CT (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Criticize and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497.https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236.https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can Likert-type scales be treated as interval scales? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical approaches. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 350–366.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
Ryan, RM, & Deci, EL (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Skaalvik, EM, & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 26–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.006
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, DL, Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, CC (2016). A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.05.002
Worthington, RL, & Whittaker, TA (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
Zee, M., & Koomen, HMY (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Educational Research Review, 17, 98–128.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.001
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Carlos Alberto Severiche Sierra, Diego Orlando Maldonado Marín

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows third parties to use the published content as long as they credit the author(s) and the publication in OnBoard Knowledge Journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



a